Hunted came to an end this week after its eight-week run. I stayed with it until the final unlikely twist, and not only because Melissa George made such a good job of the almost impossible role of gorgeous super-woman Sam Hunter. The best acting, though, came from the admirable Patrick Malahide, who made a superb elderly hard man, bent on revenge for reasons that only became clear late on.
Hunted was devised and written by Frank Spotnitz, the man behind The X Files, and this show had some of the merit of its illustrious predecessor, though there were many differences. Sam Hunter was working for a secretive (and very sinister) security company, and there were various multi-national shenanigans involving a billion pound tender for a dam project, an environmental calamity, and all manner of villains, most of whom had it in for poor old Sam.
I'm not usually very keen on stories lasting as long as eight hours. You need an exceptionally strong plot to keep the viewer interested, and although many good judges tell me that the first series of The Killing was a wonderful success, despite its length, I was slightly disappointed with the follow-up, which lasted for ten rather long hours and felt as if the script needed radical pruning. Hunted was better, because the twists and turns kept coming, and there were a couple of rather excellent twists in the final episode.
I did, however, feel that the last few minutes were rather over the top. A plot device that had been used three times already was repeated yet again, and I also became rather confused by the sheer number of conspiracies that were taking place. Hunted was by no means a masterpiece, but all in all, it was pretty well crafted, and I'm glad I stuck with it.
Showing posts with label The Killing II. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Killing II. Show all posts
Saturday, 24 November 2012
Monday, 19 December 2011
The Killing II - review
The Killing II finally came to an end this week-end. I'm not going to talk about the story-line in detail, because I imagine that some readers of this blog will be wanting to catch up with the later episodes in the near future. But a few thoughts do strike me.
This was a show of ten episodes of an hour each, which I felt began very well, and also ended strongly. At first I thought there was a tocuh of early Taggart in the enigmatic and inter-related story-lines, but this comparison only survived the first couple of episodes. Althought the plot was tangled, and had one or two good aspects, it wasn't as clever as the work of Glenn Chandler, who created Taggart.
The acting was good and the production values were pretty high. However, I felt the story sagged very badly in the middle. There were stretches when I was rather bored, and this was because the characters' relationships, although not without interest, weren't compelling enough to sustain such a protracted exercise. The political aspects of the story really didn't excite me at all.
I am still intending to watch the original series of The Killing, which attracted so many rave reviews. But overall, I'd have to rate The Killing II as a disappointment. It had a number of strengths, but to justify ten hours of story-telling, you need to have a really outstanding tale to tell. For me, at least, The Killing II too often felt like an endurance test. The story simply wasn't strong enough to justify such an investment of time.
This was a show of ten episodes of an hour each, which I felt began very well, and also ended strongly. At first I thought there was a tocuh of early Taggart in the enigmatic and inter-related story-lines, but this comparison only survived the first couple of episodes. Althought the plot was tangled, and had one or two good aspects, it wasn't as clever as the work of Glenn Chandler, who created Taggart.
The acting was good and the production values were pretty high. However, I felt the story sagged very badly in the middle. There were stretches when I was rather bored, and this was because the characters' relationships, although not without interest, weren't compelling enough to sustain such a protracted exercise. The political aspects of the story really didn't excite me at all.
I am still intending to watch the original series of The Killing, which attracted so many rave reviews. But overall, I'd have to rate The Killing II as a disappointment. It had a number of strengths, but to justify ten hours of story-telling, you need to have a really outstanding tale to tell. For me, at least, The Killing II too often felt like an endurance test. The story simply wasn't strong enough to justify such an investment of time.
Sunday, 20 November 2011
The Killing II - review
The Killing II started
on BBC Four this week-end and I made sure I watched it. I missed out on the
first showing of the original cult hit series from Denmark The Killing, a gap in my TV
viewing I mean to fill as soon as I can, given the enormously positive
reception it received.
So what do I make of
the follow-up? Well, the first two episodes were extremely watchable (the more
so by comparison, since the previous night I’d watched a rubbishy film called
The Resident which was shorter than the two hour-long episodes but was so
annoying that it felt as though it might never finish).
The story is a mix of
the personal and the political, a bit like the recent UK series Hidden, but
better. A woman is found murdered in bizarre circumstances. Her husband is a
suspect, but it soon seems that there may be a link with a second killing. The
woman was a military lawyer who worked in the Middle East, the man was an
ex-soldier. A third strand of the story involves another ex-soldier, now
confined to an institution and mysteriously denied his release.
The structure of The
Killing II reminded me of the early series of Taggart. Three or four enigmatic
story-lines, connected in some (we hope) ingenious way. And, as in the
Glaswegian series, dogged detective work, this time by Sarah Lund and Ulrik
Strange. The suggestion at the moment is
that Muslim fundamentalists are responsible for the killings, but we don’t
really believe that, do we? Could the military man who is father-in-law to the
institutionalised bloke be key to the story? That’s my bet at the moment, but we
shall see. I certainly plan to keep watching.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)