I acquired from Bob's estate Robinson's personal copy of The Manuscript Murder, published under his own name in 1933. He made a few handwritten notes on the text and also pasted on to the endpapers various reviews of the book. These included in particular a very positive notice in the Sunday Times from Dorothy L. Sayers, which must have given him enormous pleasure. My copy doesn't have a jacket and the above image comes from an excellent blog, The Grandest Game in the World
The Manuscript Murder is, as the title suggests, a 'bibliomystery', of an unusual and intriguing sort. An unconventional structural device is used in a very interesting way. A rich but disliked man dies and there is a very small pool of suspects. One of them, who is Jewish, is a detective novelist. He actually writes a story about the events leading up to the murder. But is he trying to pull the wool over the police's eyes? And what happens when another suspect then puts pen to paper?
I think this is a terrific concept and the story is well-written. The way in which the Jewish character is described would not be acceptable in a modern writer, but Robinson presents him fairly sympathetically and makes use of the antisemitic 'banter' (a loaded term) that the man suffers from his army colleagues as an element in the plot. On the whole, though, I didn't feel that the quality of the mystery quite lived up to my expectations, which were admittedly high. More could be done with this ingenious concept, I feel. But it's a laudably ambitious novel and I'm not surprised that Sayers was impressed.
4 comments:
Hi, Martin. I'm thinking you might be the one to employ -- and improve on -- Robinson's "ingenious concept" in a future historical mystery of your own!
Cheers,
Jeff
Tempting, Jeff!!
Thanks for the mention, Martin - but honour where honour is due: I took the dustjacket from the terrific https://www.dustjackets.com/.
You enjoyed this one more than I did; it was the third of four Limnelius books I read over a week, with diminishing enjoyment. Maybe too much of a good thing!
Christopher Bush wrote a few mysteries in which the suspects include detective authors who write up the fictional case (and they might have used their expertise as mystery plotters to commit murder).
Thanks, Nick! It's interesting to consider whether reading several books by the same author quickly does diminish enjoyment. I tend to think it does in many cases - I hardly ever do that myself. Christie, as ever, would be an exception.
Post a Comment