It’s a long time since I first read Patricia Highsmith’s The Talented Mr Ripley, but I enjoyed both the book and the film version starring Matt Damon. Ripley’s characertistic amorality has made him one of the most complex – and most widely discussed - villains in the history of the genre. And now, courtesy of the Crimefest quiz, I have a set of CDs of the BBC Radio adaptations of the five Ripley novels which were broadcast earlier this year.
Each of the books has been reduced to one hour, so needless to say the editing is ruthless and, inevitably, something is lost along the way. But the story is a strong and essentially simple one, and I felt that it survived the abridgement in very good shape. Tom befriends wealthy Dickie Greenleaf, and gradually starts to inhabit his life. He kills Dickie, and after various misadventures – gets away with it.
Ripley is not to everyone’s taste, but I find him extremely intriguing. When I’ve written short stories, or scenes in novels, from the perspective of amoral people, it’s been a fascinating experience. Guy, in The Arsenic Labyrinth, is such a person, and I really loved writing about him.
Highsmith famously said that she preferred to write about criminals because, for a time, they are ‘free in spirit’ and thus dramatically interesting. This may be more true of fictional criminals than the real life variety, but I can understand what she was driving at.
Tuesday 14 July 2009
The Talented Mr Ripley
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I've only seen the movie, not read the book. I'll have to read it.
One of the great things about books is the ability to escape. When I'm reading about someone who's not like me, the escape is just that much easier.
Elizabeth
Mystery Writing is Murder
Highsmith's Ripley is superb, and I agree with you about some of the reasons for the book's singularity and strength, but I disagree with you about the film because of my aversion to the casting and my diehard preference to avoid any film based upon a book that I have thoroughly enjoyed. I can think of very few films--whether in the crime/detective genre or otherwise--where the film matches or surpasses the strengths of the source material. For me, a film forever affect the vision of the mind's eye, and I cannot look again at the antecedent novel or story without having had my imagination damaged. That, however, is one readers humble perspective.
Regards from R. T. at BOOKED FOR MURDER , a blog that has been on hiatus but has, like the phoenix, been revived from the ashes.
Post a Comment